The following is a conversation with Stephen kotkin. Second time on the podcast, Steven is one of the greatest historians of all time, specializing in 20th and 21st century history of Russia and Eastern Europe, and he has written. What is widely considered to be the definitive biography of Stalin in three volumes, two of which have been published and the third focused on World War Two. And the years after he is in the midst of writing, now,
This conversation includes a response to my previous podcast episode with Oliver Stone. That was focused on Vladimir Putin and the war in Ukraine. Stephen provides a hard-hitting criticism of Putin and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Wade and contextualized deeply in the complex, geopolitics and history of our world, all with an intensity and rigor, but also wit and humor, that makes Stephen one of my favorite human beings.
Please also allow me to mention something that has been apparent and has weighed heavy on my heart and mind.
This conversation was Stephen kotkin. Makes it more dangerous for me to travel in
Russia.
The
previous conversation with Oliver Stone. Makes it more dangerous for me to travel in Ukraine.
This makes me sad but it is the way of the world. I will nevertheless travel to both Ukraine and Russia.
I need to once again see with my own eyes, the land of my ancestors where they suffered but flourished and eventually gave birth to silly old me.
I need to hear directly the pain anger and hope for both ukrainians and Russians. I won't give details to my travel plans in terms of location and timing but the trip is very soon. Whatever happens.
I'm truly grateful for every day. I'm alive and I hope to spend each such day adding a bit of love to the world. I love you all.
And now a quick few second mention of each sponsor. Check them out in the description. It's the best way to support this podcast. We got Lambda for hardware for deep learning and we got scale for data data, annotation for deep learning. Then we also have athletic greens for performance expressvpn for privacy and Roca for style Choose Wisely in my friends. And now on to the full adder. He's no ads in the middle. I tried to make this interesting, but if you skip them, please do.
Check out our sponsors. I enjoy their stuff. Maybe you will too.
The show is brought to you by Lambda computers workstations, laptops servers, Cloud compute, all for deep learning. Great, both for individual researchers and huge companies. Lambda has created easy plug-and-play access to very
powerful computation.
I actually have one of their newly released laptops that have been using for machine learning, both the training and the inference I do machine learning. I've been thinking of doing a video on this.
Laptop. Because I think it's the coolest thing ever. Honestly. It's already comes with Ubuntu. All configured for tends to flow and Pie towards all the things you need for machine learning already pre-installed. I think they also have Windows machines. But this one is Linux, which is the best operating system and I OS of Champions if I may say, so, anyway, I've been thinking of doing a video on it just to give people some insight into the machines that are part of my life because they do make my life easier, but they also mean a lot to me, I do.
I spend so many hours behind computers that in the small way or maybe a big way. They do, bring a lot of joy to my heart. Especially when those computers are doing machine learning, which is the thing. I'm deeply passionate about anyway, check out Lambda at Lambda labs.com Flex. This episode is also brought to you by scale, machine learning, assisted data labeling. Platform scale, rapid works with any use case or tasks, including image video text adaptation. Classification three.
D data and it supports 20-plus languages. I've said this before I'll say it again and again and again, I think in most cases in most real-world applications, the particular neural network architecture that you use to particular model. The particular pipeline doesn't matter nearly as much as the quality of the data that's used for labeling for training, the machine Learning Systems in your own that works. There are cases. Actually we're there.
Breakthrough performance on the algorithm
side, but they're rare. That's actually why open a eyes
Dolly to so interesting because ultimately the architecture Innovation is what provided the Improvement. But actually I don't know how much data Improvement there is two. But in any case, in most real-world application data is everything like 99% of applications. So if you want to have real world impact, make sure your annotation is done. Well is done at scale but not just quantity. It's also
Quality, so, go to scale.com Lex today. You can get your first batch of data, labeled up to 50 bucks for free again. That's scale.com Lex.
This show is brought to you by athletic greens and it's a G1 drink which is an all-in-one daily drink to support Better Health and Peak Performance. It replaced the multivitamin for me and went far beyond that, 75 vitamins and minerals. It's the first thing I drink. Every day. I drink it multiple times a day often, especially when I'm doing crazy workouts. Like I will be tomorrow and I did two days ago. So running about 12 to 15 miles after I
Home sort of exhausted hard because it's Austin and summer are almost summer and but it's you know, you're talking about 90 degree 100-degree weather a pop of athletic Greens in the fridge or the freezer actually take a quick shower pop out of the shower and then it's just nice and chill and it's delicious and it's refreshing. And it when I take it, I just feel better about my life, about my health about everything in this world.
It ensures that I have the nutritional basis for both the diet and the physical and mental, Pursuits that I take on. Anyway, they'll give you a one month supply a fish oil as well. When you sign up at athletic greens.com, Lex fish oil is one of the only other supplements. I take actually really the only supplement so I have also the electrolytes fish oil and athletic greens and given all that. I have all my bases covered.
So I thought a greens.com /, Lex.
This show is also brought to you by expressvpn. I don't know why I love expressvpn so much. I've loved them for many, many years way before. I had a podcast. Or any of that. It was just a simple button and it was a kind of liberating statement privacy.
In this world of the internet where everybody's watching, you were the big companies are watching your, they're tracing you, they're tracking, you all that kind of stuff you need protection. And that's what I mean. Some of that is just psychologically, but also technically I just press the button and I feel more protected and I in fact a more protected because I just be still track your data, even if you use sort of incognito mode on the Chrome to browse all the shade.
Up sighs you do. You can also change the location to watch different shows that are geographically restricted. Most importantly, for me. It just works. It works fast in terms of both bandwidth. In terms of software popping up works on any operating system, like Linux all of your mobile devices as well. You can go to express, EP on.com slash flexpod to get an extra three months free and we together my friend will be using the same software to press that big sexy button and put the cloak.
Of privacy protection around us. That's expressvpn.com flexpod. This shows also brought to you by Roka the makers of sexy glasses and sunglasses that I love wearing for the design and feel and Innovation on material Optics. And grip Roca was started by two, All-American swimmers from Stanford. One of whom I've met. He's a really awesome dude. Here, in Austin. They have a location where they do some of the design. I think they do manufacture here to, I don't know. The point is
All the people I met there are awesome and the vision of the company. The mission of the company is beautiful. It's they're obsessed with performance. How the thing feels that it's lightweight, you can exercise in any weather conditions, but you also want the thing to look sexy and stylish, which it does. I especially like the sunglasses with a minimalist, Sleek design, and I wear them when I run, I wear them. When I go out, that means dress shirts, also suits, all that kind of stuff or t-shirt. If, you know me, you know, that I don't have much variety.
In fashion, but I stick to the old true standards, a black shirt and jeans suit and tie black suit and tie. And maybe if I want to dress down, it'll be a black dress shirt with dress pants. The variety is overwhelming. See there's three outfits. What else do you need in life? Anyway, it holds up in all conditions, including Austin, summer weather. Check them out for both prescription glasses and sunglasses at Roca.com and enter code. Lex.
Save 20% on your first order, that's rockauto.com and enter code Lex. This is Alex Friedman podcast and now dear friends here, Stephen kotkin.
You are one of the great historians of our time. Specializing in the man, the leader, the historical figure of Stalin. So let me ask a challenging question. If you can perhaps think about the echo of 80 years between Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Putin, what are the similarities and differences between the man and the historical figure the historical trajectory of Stalin and Putin?
Thank you, Lex. It's very nice to be here again with you. It's been a while. Yeah, see you a good to see is a whole looking good. I see this podcast stuff is doing you, right? Yeah, so we can't really put very easily Vladimir Putin in the same sentence with Joseph Stalin. Stalin is a singular figure and his category is really small.
Hitler. Wow, that's really about it. And even in that category Stalin is the dominant figure. Both by how long he was in power. And also by the amount of power, the military industrial complex. He helped build and commanded.
So Putin can't be compared to that. However, Putin's in the same building as Stalin he uses some of the same offices of Stalin used on. Some of those television broadcasts that we see if Putin at meetings and Putin inside the Kremlin Stalin used to sit in those rooms and hold meetings in those rooms. That's the Imperial Senate built by Catherine, the Great and 18th century building in
The Kremlin it's don't building and you can see it on the Panorama the top of the building at least you can see it on the Panorama. When you look over the Kremlin wall from many sites inside Moscow. So if he's not comparable to Stalin, he still works as I said in those same buildings or same offices partly. And so therefore he's got some of the problems that
Stalin had which was managing Russian power in the world, from a position of weakness, vis-à-vis the west. But from a an ambition, a grandiosity, in fact, and so this combination of weakness and Grandeur right of of not being as strong as the west but aspiring to be as great or greater than the West, that's the Dilemma of Russian history for the past.
The centuries. It was the Dilemma for the czar's. It was the Dilemma for Peter. The Great that was the Dilemma for Alexander. It was the Dilemma for Stalin and it's the Dilemma for Putin. Russia is smaller. Now compared to one Stalin was in that Kremlin. It's got pushed back to borders, almost the time of Peter, the Great, it's father from the main European capitals now than any time since that 18th century.
And it and the West is only grown stronger in that period of time. So the Dilemma is greater than ever.
The irony of being in that position of sitting in the Kremlin trying to manage Russian power in the world, trying to be a providential power, a country with a special mission in the world, a country, which imagines itself to be a whole civilization. And yet not having the capabilities to meet those aspirations and falling farther and farther behind the West, the irony of all of that is the attempted Solutions.
Put Russia in a worse place every single time. So you try to manage the Gap with the West. You try to realize these aspirations. You try to raise your capabilities and you build a strong State. The quest to build a strong State and use coercive modernization to try somehow. If not to close the gap with the West, at least to manage it. And the result is
Different versions of personalist rule, so they don't build a strong State, they build a personal dictatorship. They build an autocracy and moreover, that autocracy undertakes measures, which then worse in the very geopolitical dilemma that gave rise to this personalist rule in the first place. And so, I call this Russia's Perpetual geopolitics. I've been writing about this for many many years. What's important about
about this analysis is this is not a story of Eternal Russian cultural proclivity to aggression. It's not something that's in the mother's milk. It's not something that can't be changed. Russia, doesn't have an innate cultural tendency to aggression. This is a choice. It's a strategic choice to try to match the power of the West, which
From Russia's, vantage point is actually unmatchable but it's a choice that's made again. And again. And Putin has made this choice. Just the Stalin made that choice, right? Stalin. Presided over the world war to Victory and then he lost the peace.
After he died in 1953, there was, of course, other rulers who succeeded him. He was still the most important person in the country after he died because they were trying to manage that system that he built. And more importantly, managed that growing Gap with the west. By the time the 90s rolled around former Soviet troops. Now Russian troops withdrew from all those Advanced positions that they
Had achieved as a result of the world war to Victory and it was Napoleon in Reverse. They went on the same roads, but not from Moscow, back to Paris. But instead from Warsaw and from East Berlin, and from tollan and Regan, and all the other places of former Warsaw Pact, and former Soviet republics in the Baltic region. They went back to Russia in Retreat. And so Stalin.
In the fullness of time, lost the peace and Putin in his own way inheriting, some of this attempting to reverse it. When as I said Russia was smaller, father away weaker. The West was bigger and stronger and and had absorbed those former Warsaw Pact countries and Baltic states, because they voluntarily begged to join the West. The West, didn't it?
Hose itself on them. It's a voluntary sphere of influence that the West conducts. And so that dilemma is where you can put Putin and Stalin in the same sentence and the terrible outcome for Russia in the fullness of time. Also has Echoes. What? Of course, Putin hasn't murdered 18 to 20 million people and the scale of his abilities to cause grief.
With the nuclear weapons aside is nothing like Stalin's and so we have to be careful. Right? Only Mal put bigger numbers on the board from a tragic point of view than
Stalin and numbers matter. Here. If we compare these singular
figures.
Yeah, Mal killed more people than Stalin because Mal had more people to kill. The most amazing thing about Mao. Is he watched Stalin? Do it? He watched all and collectivized, Agriculture. And famine result. He watched Stalin impose this communist Monopoly. And all of those people sent to prison or given a bullet in the back of the neck. He watched all of that and then he did it again himself and
China. You think he's
Saw the human cost directly that, that when you say he saw, do you think he was focused on the policies or was see? Also, where distinctly as a human being of the human cost in the lives of peasants and all in the lives of the working class in the lives of the
poor. I think the prima facie evidence is that he didn't value human life. Otherwise, I don't think after seeing the amount of lives that were taken and the Soviet experiment he would have done something.
Of similar after that. I think the answer likes is it's very hard to get inside Mi head and figure out what he was really thinking. But if you just look at the results that happened, the policies that were undertaken and the consequences of them. You would have to conclude that there was let's say no value or little value placed on human life. Unfortunately, that's characteristic, not only of communist dictators, right? Of post-communist.
Taters as well, but the scale of the horrors that they
inflict
as horrific as they are just can't compare. And so we're in a situation where Eurasia that is to say, the ancient civilizations of Eurasia, which would be Russia Iran, China.
All have some version of non-democratic, you know illiberal autocratic regimes and they're all pushing up against the greater power of the West in some form. Sometimes they coordinate their actions and sometimes they don't. But this is a very long-standing phenomenon likes that predates of Latino Putin or XI jingping or the latest incarnation of the supreme leader in Iran,
so we'll talk about
All this, I think really powerful framework of five dimensions of authoritarian regimes that you've put together. But first, let's go to this Napoleon and reverse Retreat. From Warsaw back, Putin is called from the perspective of Putin. This Retreat. This collapse of Stalin is one of the great tragedies of that region of Russia.
Do you think there's a sense? Whereas Putin sits now in power for 22 plus years. He really dreams of a return.
^ the influence, the the land of Stalin. So while you said that they're not in the same place in terms of the numbers of people that suffered due to their regime. Do you think he hopes to have the same power, the same influence for a nation that was in the 30s and the 40s and the 50s?
Of the 20th century under Stalin
if he does Lexi's deluding himself.
We don't know for sure. Very few people talk to him. Very few people have access to him. A handful of Western leaders have met with him for short periods of time. Those inside Russia, Bailey meet with him, his own minions in the regime. Barely have face time with him. We don't know exactly what he thinks. It could be that he has delusions.
Ian's of reconquering Russian influence, if not direct control over the territories that broke away, but it's not going to happen. Let's talk a little bit about this guy. Nikolai partnership. Nikolai patrushev is probably not well known to your listeners. He's the head of Russia's Security Council and so you could probably call him the second most important or second. Most
Powerful man. In Russia, certainly inside the regime.
Arguably navalny is the second most important person in the country and we'll talk about that later. I'm sure
terms of influence.
Yes, but what part through Chef is a version of Putin's right hand man.
And part of Chef has been giving interviews in the Press. You probably saw the interview with needs a Visa my guys yet. They're not that long ago. He writes also his own blog like interventions in the public sphere using the few channels that are left.
And what's interesting about Potter chef. And this could well, reflect similar thinking to Putin's, which is why I'm bringing this up.
Is that he's got this conspiratorial theory that the West has been on a forever campaign to destroy Russia. Just like it destroyed the Soviet Union and that everything. The West does is meant to dismember Russia. And that Russia is fighting an existential battle against the west and so for example, the CIA in the American government wanted to bring down the Soviet.
Never mind that the Bush Administration. The first Bush, the father was trying desperately to hold the Soviet Union together because they were afraid of the chaos that might ensue and the nukes that might get Loose as a result of a Soviet collapse and it was until the very last moment where Bush decided his administration decided to back those Republican leader.
Hers who were breaking away from me. How Gorbachev and the Soviet Union, right? So never mind the empirics of it. Never mind that Bill Clinton's Administration. Following George Bush said, boatloads of money, Western taxpayer money to Russia. We don't know exactly how much because it came from different sources. People talked about how there was no Marshall Plan, it was tens of billions of dollars from various sources from the I am
F and other sources and Lex it disappeared. It's gone. Just like the German money. That went to Gorbachev for unification disappeared. Even before the Soviet collapse, the money disappeared, but the West sent the money. So how is that a plot? And then you could go all the way, Obama administration. George Bush trying to do business deals and reset the relations and Obama administration, trying to reset the relations and, and, and doing nothing after the Georgian war. And
Slapping Putin on the wrist, following the seizure, forcible, and you could go on and you could go on all the way through the Trump Administration. Telling Putin, that he's right, Trump believes Putin and doesn't believe you are so intelligent about Russian efforts to interfere in American domestic politics. So, despite all the empirics of it, you have partnership and likely Putin talking about this multi-decade.
Conspiracy to bring Russia down at the same time. As that's happening. The Germans are voluntarily, increasing their dependence on Russian energy, voluntarily increasing their dependence on Russian. And so, here's the conspiracy to bring Russia down the French who fantasized about themselves as a diplomatic superpower are constantly. The French leaders are constantly running to the Kremlin to ask what Russia needs.
What concessions from the West Russia needs to be filled to feel respected. Again, the British provide all manner of money, laundering and reputation laundering services for the whole Russian oligarchy, including the state officials, who are looting, the state, and using the West British institutions to launder their money. So, all of this is happening and yet, partnership imagines this conspiracy to bring Russia down by the
West. And so, that's what we've got in the Kremlin again. Stalin had that same conspiratorial mentality of the West. Everything that happened in the world was part of a western conspiracy directed against the Soviet Union and out directed against Russia, even though the West is trying to appease the West is offering its services. The West is try to change Russia through investment in a positive way, but but, but instead, the West is what's changing. The West is becoming more.
Upped Western Services are being corrupted by the relationship with Russia. So you have to ask yourself who are these people in power and the Kremlin who imagine that. While they're availing themselves of every service, and every blandishments of the West, while they're availing themselves of this that they're fighting a conspiracy by the West to bring them down. So this is what they call the Ibiza.
Yeah, right in Russian, which is a term as you know, that means those who are resentful or you might call them the losers, the losers in the transition. So when the Soviet Union fell and there was a diminishment of a very substantial diminution in Russian power and influence in the world. A lot of people lost out. They weren't able to steal the property. They weren't able to loot.
The state in the 90s, and they were on the outside. They gradually came back in, they were the losers in the transition domestically and for them.
Right. They wanted to reverse being on the losing side. And so they began to expropriate to steal the money steal the property from those first thieves who stole in the 90s and the 2000s and on have been about re stealing taking the losers in the transition, taking the money from the winners and reversing this resentment. This loser status.
Those are your Partnerships on your Putin's but at the same time this blows out to Let's reverse the losses being on the losing side, the roiling resentment at the decline of their power internationally. Let's try to reverse that too. So you have a profound psychological whole generation of people who are on the losing end domestically and reverse. That domestically that's
The Putin regime is about. Remember me. Kyle harder, coughs Keys. Yukos. Remember, all the companies that are now owned by Putin cronies, because they were taken away from whoever stole them in the first place. And now they're trying to do that on the international scale. It's one thing to put domestic opponents in jail. It's one thing to take away someone's property domestically, but you're not going to reverse the power of the West, with the
Finished Russia that you have. And so that project that partnership project, which we see him expressing again. And again, he speaks about it publicly. It's not something that we need to go looking for it. A quest, the secret. We can't find it. What are they thinking? It's right there in front of our face and Putin has spoken the same way for a long time. People point to the 2007 speech.
at the Munich security conference that Putin delivered and certainly your listeners could use a snippet or two of that just like they could use a couple of quotes from patro Chef to contextualize what we're talking about, but it predates, the 2007 Munich speech, it the reaction to Ukraine's Uprising in 2004 attempt to
Steal the election inside Ukraine, right? Which the Ukrainian people rose up valiantly against and risk their lives and overturned, right? So there were public statements from Putin already back. Then the, the statements about hotter, coughs key in 2003 when he was arrested in expropriated. This is a long-standing psychological deeply psychological issue, which is about managing Russian power on the world. As I was saying the Gap with the
Best. But has this further dimension of feeling like losers and wanting to reverse that that's their life experience
abused in there. So there's that resentment, that fuels this narrative fuels this geopolitics and internal policy. But so resentment is behind some of the worst things that have ever been done in human history. Hitler was probably fueled by resentment. So resentment is a really powerful force. Yes.
I just too.
Maybe not pushed back but to give Fuller context on the west. You said the there's a narrative from from Putin's Russia. That the West is somehow an enemy. You position everything, against the west but is their degree. And to what degree is the worst willing to feed that narrative, that it's also convenient for the West to have an enemy. It seems like in the place in the span.
It seems like in geopolitics having an enemy is useful for forming a narrative. Now, having an enemy for the basic respect of humanity is not good. But in terms of maintaining power, if you're a leader in a game of geopolitics, it seems to be good to have an enemy. It seems to be good to have something like a cold war. We can always Point your finger and says all our actions are fighting this evil.
Over that evil is, it could be like with George w-- Bush. The war on terror. Terrorism is this evil. You can always point in something. So you've made it seem that the West is trying. There's a lot of forces within the West that are trying to reach out a friendly hand. Trying to help sending money sending compassion, and trying to sort of
trying to integrate Russia into a global institution, exactly, which was a long-standing multi-decade effort across multiple countries and
People administration's in those
countries, but is there, also war mongers on the
west, the horse Lex? Of course, you're right about that. But let's put it this way. People talk about the Cold War and they usually looking to assign blame for the Cold War as if it's some kind of mistake a misunderstanding or a search for an enemy that was convenient to Rally domestic politics solex.
There's a coup in Czechoslovakia and somebody installs a communist regime in February, 1948. No reaction to that. That's just okay. There's a blockade of Berlin. Is that cool by you, where they try to strangle West Berlin so that they can swallow West Berlin and added to East Berlin? You cool with that. How about Korean War invasion of North Korea invasion?
Of South Korea by North Korea. You cool, with that. How about the murders and the show trials up and down Eastern Europe in the late 40s after the imposition of the Clone regimes, you good with that? Yeah. It's very convenient to have an enemy. I agree with you. But you know, there was some actions. Lex, there was some threats to people's freedom. There was some invasions there was some aggression and violence on a
Scale, like collectivization of Eastern Europe and we could go on Lex with the examples. I'm just giving a few of them. And so the Cold War was not a mistake. It was not a misunderstanding, don't have to blame someone for the Cold War. We have to give credit for the Cold War. The Truman Administration deserves credit for standing up the Stalin's regime for standing up to these actions for saying yeah.
We're not just going to take this. We're not going to let this go on. We're not going to let this expand to further territories. We're going to create the NATO alliance and we're going to Rally Democratic liberal regimes to stand up to this ill, liberalism this violence and this aggression. And so, yeah, Lex it's always convenient to have an enemy, but there was an enemy
Nikolai Lyon a fool recently died. He died in April, 20, 22 and he had a major funeral. He was the last head analyst of the Soviet KGB and Leona Fizz. One of the most important figures for understanding the Soviet collapse and he has the best Memoir on the Soviet collapse, which is known in Russian as lethal a TIA.
You will understand that and, and, and you'll help your your podcast listeners. Understand. There's a singularity to that kind of expression. Lethal at you, leonov just died, but one of the things he and in fact, the people who were supposedly arrested by Putin as scapegoats for the Ukraine war, the main 1cr, Gabe asada gave the eulogy at Leona funeral in April 20.
To showing that. It's a lie that all of these people have been arrested in purged and all the nonsense and social media, but to get back to what Leon of said and get back to your enemy Point. Leonov said, you know, the West spent all this time, blackening the image of the Soviet Union, all these resources and propaganda and covert operations to blacken the Soviet image, and they did Lex the West did do that. And then,
Leona throat in the next sentence and you know what? We gave them a lot of material to work with to Blacken our
image. Yeah. That. So the you're saying a kind of sobering reality which it is possible to some degree to draw a line between the good guys and the bad guys.
Freedom is better than unfreedom Lex. It's a lot better than unfreedom and a guy like you on the stands that really well.
Well, so yes, but those are all
There's Wars like justice Freedom. What else? Love you can use a lot of words that Hitler himself used to describe why he is actually creating a better world. Then those is fighting. So some of it is propaganda. The question is on the ground. What is actually increasing the amount of freedom in the world in certain
positions? Lex right? We're not talking about propaganda here. Well,
We use words like Freedom. We're talking about rule of law. We're talking about protection of civil liberties. We're talking about protection of private property. We're talking about an independent and well-funded Judiciary. We're talking about an impartial non-corrupt competent Civil Service. We're talking about separation of powers where the executive Branch's power is limited usually by an elected parliament. In fact, yes, let's talk about
Elections. Let's talk about freedom of speech and freedom of the public sphere. We're not talking about Freedom as a slogan here. We're talking about a huge array of Institutions and practices and Norms ultimately, right? And if they exist, you know, and you live on to them and if they don't exist, you fully understand that as well. Ukraine was a flawed democracy before Russia.
Invaded. It is utterly corrupt, many ways dysfunctional, especially the elites would dysfunctional the gas industry and Ukraine was absolutely terrible. Because of the corruption that it generated, the oligarch problem. A handful of people stealing the state resources. And yet Ukraine had an open public sphere and it had a parliament to functioned and so despite its flaws.
It was still a democracy, the regime in Moscow. You can't say that Lex.
It's not a comparable regime to Ukraine. You could say oh well, they were Oleg arcs in Ukraine and there are Oleg arcs in Russia. There's corruption in Ukraine. There's corruption in Russia. So really, what's the big difference? The answer is well, Ukraine had the open public sphere? Ukraine had a real Parliament. Can you call Russia's Duma a real Parliament? I don't think so. I don't think you can't. Can you say that they were any checks whatsoever on the executive branch in Russia?
Can you say that the Russian Judiciary had any Independence or really full level of competence even compared to the Ukrainian Judiciary, which was nothing to brag about. No, you can't say that. Lex. So we can differentiate between the very flawed corrupt, oligarch oligarchic democracy in Ukraine and the very corrupt oligarchic autocracy in Russia. I think that's
A fair
distinction. Yeah, we should say that Russia and Ukraine have the great honor of being the number one. And the number two, most corrupt nations in Europe by many measures, but there is a fundamental difference. As you're highlighting. Russia is a corrupt autocracy Ukraine. We can say is a corrupt democracy and to that level there's a there's a fundamental difference.
Ukraine is not murdering its own journalists. In systematic fashion. If journalists are killed in Ukraine, it's a tragedy if journalists are killed in Russia or Russian journalists who killed the broad, its regime policy
and the degree to, which a nation is authoritarian. Means that it's suffocating its own Spirit, its capacity to flourish. It's we're not just talking about sort of
For the freedom of the press, those kinds of things. But basically, all Industries, get suffocated, and you're no longer being able to. Yeah, Flores is a nation. Grow the production of the GDP. The scientist, the art, the culture, all those kinds of thing.
Yes, Lex. You're absolutely right. And so before The Invasion, the full-blown invasion of February, 20, 22 and to Ukraine because as you know, the war has been going on for many years at a lower level compared to what it is.
It is these days but still a tragic war with many deaths prior to February 20 22 before. This latest War, we could have said that the greatest victims of the Putin regime all Russian domestic that the the people who are suffering the most from the Putin regime are not sitting here in New York City. But in fact, they're sitting there in Russia. Now, of course, with the invasion of Ukraine and really
The atrocities that have been well documented and more being investigated. We can't easily say anymore. That Russians are the greatest victims of the Putin regime, but in in ways other than bombing and murdering civilians children, mothers grandmothers grandfathers.
After you include that then, of course, the larger number of victims of the Putin regime are not ukrainians, but ultimately Russians. And and there's how many of them now that have fled.
So you're powerful precise, rigorous words are standing in a stark contrast. I would say to my very recent conversation with Oliver Stone. Now, I would love you to elaborate to this agreement. You have
With his words, may be words of people like John mearsheimer. The idea is that Putin's hand. In this invasion of 2022 was forced by the expansion of NATO, the imperialist imperative of the United States and the, the NATO forces you disagree with this point, in terms of placing the blame somehow.
How on The Invasion on forces larger than the particular two Nations involved, but more on the geopolitics of the world that is driven by the most powerful military nation in the world, which is the United
States He elects. So let's imagine that a tragedy has happened here in New York and a woman got raped.
We know the perpetrator. They go to trial and Oliver Stone gets up and says, you know what, the woman was wearing a short skirt, and there was no option but for the rapist to rape her, the woman was wearing lipstick or the woman was applying for NATO membership and just had to be raped. There's I mean didn't water Raper.
But was compelled because of what she was doing and what she looked like. And and the clothes she was wearing in the alliance's that she was under international law, signed by Moscow all the treaties that Sovereign countries, get to choose whatever Alliance they belong to. A Treatise that the UN Charter signed by Russia Soviet Union, The 1975, Helsinki
Agreement signed by the Soviet Union, the 1990 Charter of Paris, for a new Europe, signed by the Soviet Union, the 1997 nato-russia founding act signed by the Russian government. The post-soviet, Russia, all of those documents signed by either the Soviet regime, or the Russian regime, which is the legally recognized International inheritor, right? Successor of the Soviet state, all of those agreements.
Still in force. In all of them, say that countries are sovereign and can freely choose their foreign policy and what alliances they want to join. Let's even go farther than that. I mean, you don't have to go farther than that. But let's go farther than that. Lex is an autocratic repressive regime, that invades its neighbors in the name of its own security. Something new in Russian history. Did we not see this before? Is this?
Does this not predate NATO expansion? Does this not predate the existence of NATO where Oliver Stone sit here in this chair and say to you, you know, they had to impose serfdom in the 17th century because needle expanded. They had no choice their hands were tied. They were compelled to treat their own population like slaves because, you know, NATO expanded. I mean, I could go on through the examples of
Russian history that predate, the existence, let alone, the expansion of NATO where you have Behavior policies actions. Very similar to what we see now from the Kremlin and and you can explain those by NATO expansion. Can you and so that argument doesn't wash for me because I have a pattern here that predates, NATO expansion. I have international.
Its founding documents signed by the Kremlin over many, many decades acknowledging, the freedom of countries to choose their alliances. And then I have this problem where when you rape somebody, it's not because they're wearing a short skirt. It's because you have raped them.
You've committed a criminal act. Lex. That's a, I think there's a lot of people listening to this. They'll agree to the emotion, the power in the spirit of this metaphor. I was struggling to think how to dance with in this metaphor because it feels like it wasn't precisely the right one. But I think this it captures, the spirit.
I'm not suggesting likes that everything. The West has done.
Has been honorable or intelligent. Fortunately, we live in a democracy. We live in Liberal regimes. We live on the rule of law. Liberal in the classical sense of rule of law, not liberal in the leftist sense.
We live in places like that and we can criticize ourselves and we can criticize the mistakes that we made or the policy choices or the in actions that were taken. And there are a whole lot of things to answer for and, and, and you can now discuss the ones that are your favorites, the dishonor or the mistakes, and I could discuss mine and we could spend the whole rest of our meeting today. Discussing the
West's mistakes
and cry and we won't end up in prison for
it. Yeah, Alexis and so that's I'm thankful for that. Yes, and I'm thankful that people may disagree and that people make the argument that NATO expansion is to blame, but you see, I'm countering two arguments here. I'm countering one argument which is very deeply popular. Pervasive about how Russia has this cultural tendency to aggression and it can help but invade its
Isn't it does it again? And again and it's Eternal Russian imperialism. And you have to watch out for it. This very popular argument in the Baltic states. It's really popular in Warsaw. It's really popular with the liberal interventionists. And it's very, very popular with those who were part of the Iraq War Squad that got us into that mess. So I'm against that and the reason I'm against it. It's because it's not true. It's empirically false. There is no.
Natural trait, inherent tendency for Russia to be aggressive. It's a strategic choice that they
make every time it's a choice made. It's not some kind of momentum. Every time it's a choice that we should judge for the choice that it is for the
decision. And therefore they could make different choices. They could say, we don't have to stand up to the West. We don't have the capabilities to do that. We can still be a great country. We can still be a civilization unto itself. We can still be Russia, we can still
Worship in Orthodox Cathedrals, or we can still be ourselves, but we don't have to pursue this chimerical Pursuit. This elusive quest to stand up to the west and be in the first ranks of powers. So I'm countering that argument. I'm saying it's a it's perpetual geopolitics. It's a geopolitical choice rising out of this dilemma of the mismatch between aspirations and capabilities. It's not
Enel, Russian imperialism. And I'm also countering the other argument here. Lex, which is to say that it's the West fault. It's Western imperialism. I very popular on the left, very popular with real, is Scholars, very popular with some of the people recently on your podcast. And so it's neither Eternal Russian imperialism. Nor is it Western imperialism, right? The mere fact that the West is stronger than Russia, is not a crime.
On the part of the West, it's not a crime that countries voluntarily want to join the West that bag to get in either the EU or NATO or other bilateral, alliances or other trade agreements. Those are voluntarily entered into and and that's not criminal. If the West sphere of influence which is open and open sphere of influence, which as I say, people voluntarily join if that expands that's not.
A crime nor is that a threat to Russia? Ipso facto, right? NATO was a defensive Alliance and the countries are largely passive as to where members of NATO and NATO doesn't attack. It defends members if they are attacked. And so the idea that Ukraine, which had the legal right might want to join NATO and the EU which was not going to happen in our lifetimes and was not a direct threat to the Putin regime since it was since the
Western countries that make up the EU and NATO.
Decided that Ukraine was not ready for membership. There was no consensus. It was not going to happen, but it's Ukraine's. Free choice to his Express that desire. And if your government is elected by your people freely elected, meaning you can unelect that government in the next election. And that government makes foreign policy choices on the basis of its perceived interests. That's not a crime likes, that's not a provocation.
That's not something that compels the leader of another country to invade. You write that is legal under international law. And it's also a realist fact of life. The realists like to tell you. You know, that Russia here was the was disrespected. Russia's interests were not taken into account, etc. Etc. But the real world Works in such a way that treaties matter that international law matters. That's why people
Like me, we're not in favor of the u.s. 2003 invasion of Iraq, Lex because it wasn't legal, in addition, to the fact that we thought it might backfire. But, you know, Lex, like I said, there are a lot of things about the West that we ought to criticize US citizens and we do criticize, but, but we have to be clear about where the responsibility lies in these events that were talking about today.
So you get the trouble is
RJ erroneous to think about both the west or the United States from an imperialist perspective and Russia from an imperialist perspective is better clearer to think about each individual aggressive decision on its own as a choice that was made. So let's talk about the most recent Choice made by Vladimir Putin.
The choice to invade Ukraine, or to escalate the invasion of Ukraine on February 24th, 2022. Now, we're a few months removed from that decision initial decision. Why do you think he did it? What are the errors in understanding the situation in? Calculating the outcomes and everything else about this decision and your view
Yeah, Lex when you don't win a war, doesn't go. Well, it looks like lunacy to have launched it in. The first place. Does it ever go warn ever goes? According to plan, all war is based upon miscalculation, but not everybody has punished for their miscalculation. All aggressive War were talking about. Not defensive war is based upon miscalculation, but you can adjust. You can recalibrate.
And you know, when you're driving down the road and that very annoying voice is telling you in a thousand feet, make a right. Yeah, and you fail to make a right recalibrates, right? It tells you, okay. Now, you know, go turn around or you turn or make a left. It doesn't say you're an idiot and turn around and make a U-turn, but it does recalibrate, so you can miscalculate. And the problem is not the miscalculation. Usually, it's the failure to do.
Adjustment, right? People. I know who are hedge fund Traders. They, I asked them, you know, what's your favorite trade and the line from the mall? And this is a cliche, is my favorite trade is when I made a mistake, but I got out early before, all the Carnage. So at their favorite trade is not when they made some brilliant choice, but it's when they miscalculated what they reduce the consequences of their miscalculation by
Reading quickly, right? So, let's talk about the calculation and miscalculation of February. Let's imagine legs that you've been getting away with murder. I don't mean murder in a figurative sense. I mean, you've been murdering people. You've been murdering them domestically, and you've been murdering them all across Europe and you've been murdering them, not just with, for example.
A car accident, a staged, car accident, or using a handgun, you use Nova choke.
Or you use some other internationally outlawed chemical weapon.
And let's imagine that you did it and nothing happened to you. It wasn't like, you were removed from power. It wasn't like you paid a personal price. Sure. Maybe there was some sanctions on your economy, but you didn't pay the price of those sanctions. Little people paid the price. So those sanctions other people in your country paid the price. Let's imagine not only will you murdering people literally, but you decided to
The idiotic ruler of Georgia.
Into a provocation that you could then invade the country.
And you invaded the country. And you bid off, these territories of Kazi, and Southeast Asia. And what price did you pay for that?
And then you decided, you know, I think I'll now invaded Crimea and forcibly, Annex Crimea, and I'll instigate an Insurrection in the donbas in eastern, Ukraine and luhansk. And let's imagine you did all that. And then you had a stick out your wrist so that, you know, it could be slapped a couple of times and you said, you know, I can pretty much do what I want. They're putting up the sanction here and there and they're doing this and they're doing
That and you know what, they're more energy dependent on me than before. I got better money, laundering, and reputation Services than anybody has. Maybe it's the Middle East in the Chinese would disagree with you, that, that you have better than them, but yours are pretty good and the Panama papers. Get released, revealing all of your offshoring and your corruption and and what happened, nothing happens, Lex. So the first and most important consideration here is in your own mind. You've been
I'm getting away with murder, literally, as well as figuratively. And you think, you know, I probably can do something again and get away with it. And so the failure to respond that scale. In fact, the Indulgence has the further dependencies that are introduced the illusion that trade is the mechanism to manage or authoritarian regimes. You know that great a German cliche.
Avondale door handle I changed through trade or transformation through trade, one of Angela merkel's favorite Expressions, right? You're going to get the other side to be better.
Rather than confront them in a cold war fashion, where you stand up to their aggressions and you punish them severely in order to deter further Behavior. So, that's the first and most important part of the calculation miscalculation. There are a lot of other
dimensions. It can we pause on that really quick. So, this is kind of idea of, it's okay to crack a few eggs, to make an omelet, which is a more generous description. Will what you're saying that?
You don't incorporate into the calculation. The amount of human suffering that the decisions cause, but instead you look at sort of the success based on some kind of measure for you personally and for the nation in, not in terms of in the humanitarian sense, but in some kind of economic sense and a power geopolitical power sense. Yeah, you're
not sentimental X. You say to yourself.
Self.
The cause of Russian greatness is greater than any individual life.
Russia being in the first rank of the great Powers. Russia, realizing its mission to be.
A special country with a special mission in the world is civilization onto itself, the first rank of the great Powers, maybe even the greatest power that's worth the price that we have to pay. Especially in other people's lives. Right? We have a lot of literature on the Putin regime, which talks about the kleptocracy. The place is a kleptocracy and it is a kleptocracy. We all can see that.
And anybody in London, living the High Life servicing this clip. Talk receipt can testify that it's a kleptocracy and not only in London, of course right here in the United States in New York, but you know, it's not only a kleptocracy. Lex, that was the problem of the Russian studies literature. It wasn't just about stealing looting the state. It was about Russian greatness. You see those rituals in?
The Kremlin right in the grand, Kremlin Palace in the st. George's Hall. Some of the greatest Interiors in the world and you see award ceremonies and you see marking holidays and all of these looters of the state have their uniforms on with their medals and someone's given a speech or singing, a ballad, and their eyes are moist.
Their eyes are moist because they're thieves and looters no legs because they believed in Russian greatness. They have a deep and fundamental passionate commitment to the greatness of Russia, which in unsentimental fashion, they're all sentimental to the max. That's why they're their eyes are moistening, but they imagined unsentimental e that any sacrifices. Okay, a sacrifice of other people's lives.
A sacrifice of their conscripts in the military, a sacrifice of Ukrainian women and children and elderly. That's a small price to pay for those moist eyes about Russian greatness and Russia's position in the world
without human thing that sentimentality is a thing. Then get us in trouble in the United States as well and lead us to Wars that illegal Wars and so on. But the United States has repercussions for breaking the law.
You're going to pay for legal wars in the end. You're saying that in our third tearing regimes, the some sentimentality can really get out of hand and you can buy charismatic leaders that can take that to manipulate the populace to make to that in the span of History. Led to atrocities and in today's world lead to humanitarian crises.
It's not just the kleptocracy. It's a belief system. It's passion its conviction. It's it's it's
You can call them Illusions. You can call them fantasies, whatever you want to call them. They're real. They're real for those people. And so, yes, there, looting that very state that they're trying to make one of the great powers in the world and they resent. The fact that the West doesn't acknowledge them as one of those great powers and they resent that the West is more powerful people talk about how Putin doesn't understand.
The world and that it gets really bad information. Lex, if you're sitting there in that Kremlin and you're trying to conduct business in the world and you're getting reports from your finance minister or your Central Bank. Governor your whole economy, everything that matters somehow. All your trade is denominated in dollars and euros.
Do you have any Illusions about who controls the International Financial system? I don't think so. Lex. You looking over your industrial plan for the next year and you're looking over how many tanks you're going to get and how many cruise missiles you're going to get and how many submarines you're going to get and and and fill in the blank and you know what it says, right there in the paperwork, where the component parts come from, where the software comes from comes from the way.
Flex your whole military industrial complex is dependent on high-end Western technology. And then, and let's and let's say you're in Beijing, not just in Moscow. And you go to a meeting in your own neighborhood. You're the leader of China. You go to a meeting with other Asian leaders. Do they all speak in Chinese with? You know, Lex, they don't speak Chinese. You go to an international meeting as the leader of China and guess what language is the main language?
Of intercourse. Yes, the same one you and I are speaking right now. And so you live in that world you live in the western world and it's very hard to have Illusions about what world you live in. When you're under that print, you need those Western Banks. You need that foreign currency, right? You need that high-end, Western technology that technology transfer your speaking or you're forced to speak or your minions are forced to speak at International gatherings in English, and
And I could go on all the indicators that you live in, and so Putin lives in that world. He's no fool.
Well to push back. Isn't it possible? That as you said the minions operate in that world, but can't you, if you're the leader of Russia or the leader of China or the leader of these different nations still put up walls where actually when you think in the privacy of your own mind, you exist not in the international world.
But in a world where there's this great Russian Empire, or this great Chinese Empire. Yeah, and then you forget that there's English. You forget that there's technology and iPhones, you forget that there is all this u.s. Keeps popping up on all different paperwork that just becomes the blurry details that dissipate because what matters is the greatness of this dream Empire that I have in my mind as a dictator,
I would put it this way. Lex after you.
Or all of that from your minions and and it impresses upon your Consciousness where you live, you live in a western dominated world that the multipolar world doesn't exist. Your goal is to make that multipolar world exists. Your goal is to bring down the West, your goal is for the West to weaken. Your goal is a currency other than the dollar and the Euro your goal is an
National Financial system that you dominate your goal is technological, self-sufficiency made in China. 2035. Write your goal is a world that you dominate not that the West dominates and you're going to do everything. You can to try to attain that world, which is a Russian Centric world, or a Chinese Centric world, or what we could call a Eurasian Centric world and it's not going to be easy.
Lex, just for the reasons that where we enumerated before, but maybe you're going to get a helping hand. Maybe the West is going to transfer their best technology to you. They're going to sell you their best stuff.
And then you're going to absorb it and maybe copy it and reverse engineer it and and if they won't sell it to you. Maybe you'll just have to steal it.
Maybe the West is going to allow you to bank even though you violate many laws that would prohibit the west from extending those banking services to you.
Maybe the West is going to buy your energy and your Palladium and your titanium and your rare metals like lithium because you're willing to have your poor people mind that stuff and died of disease at an early age. But Western governments, they don't want to do that. Right? They don't want to do that dirty. Mining of those very important rare Earths, but you're willing to do that because it's just people whose lives you don't care about as an autocratic regime, right? So,
That's the world you live in where you're trying to get to this other world. You're at the center of the other world. You dominate the other world, but the only way to get their legs is the West has to weaken divide itself, maybe even collapse. And so you're encouraging to the extent possible, Western divisions, western disunity, western lack of resolve.
Western mistakes and West invasion of the wrong country and western destruction of its credibility through International Financial crises and one could go on. So the if the West weakens itself through its mistakes and its own corruption, you are going to survive and maybe even come out into that world where you're the center and so Russia is entire Grand strategy. Just like Chinese Grand strategy. Iran is
To say they have a grand strategy because they're so. So profoundly week, but Russia's Grand strategy is where a mess. We don't invest in our human capital are human capital fleas or we actually drive it out. It goes to MIT like you did or it goes to fill in the blank right. With we can invest in our people. Our health care is terrible. Our education system is in Decline. We don't build in
For structure, Lex. We don't improve our governance. We don't invest in those attributes of modern power that make the West powerful. We can't. Because when we try the money is stolen, we try these grandiose projects of national projects. They're called. We're going to invest in higher ed. We're going to invest in high-tech. We're going to build our own Silicon Valley known as skulk of all. We're going to do all those things. And what happens
It can't even build an airport without the money disappear. The Sochi Olympics, less the cost them officially cost them fifty billion dollars, you look around that the infrastructure that endured from that fifty billion dollar expense and you're thinking, you know, that's like the Second Avenue subway, you get almost nothing for your money. And so yeah, it's corruption legs, but it's also because they don't want to do that. They don't want to invest in their people.
They couldn't do it if they wanted to and when they try, it doesn't work. But why invest in your own people invest in your Hardware, your military hardware invest in your cyber capabilities, invest in, all your spoil ation techniques in your heart power and invest in further corrupting and further weakening and further dividing the West. Because, as I said, if
The West is we divided, lacking resolve. You don't invest in your people. You don't build infrastructure. You don't improve your governance, but you'll model through that's Russian Grand
strategy. So invest in the hard, power weakened the West. Those combined together means you're going to be serve. I sent devised to in escalate any military aggressive conflicts that are around you or create new ones
or if you can get away.
Away with murder, but what happens Lex if it's a Harry Truman like response. What happens? If somebody says, you know, we're going to stand up to this.
We're not going to allow this to happen. We're not going to launder your money anymore. We're not going to be dependent on you, for energy in the long term. We're going to make a transition. We're going to punish you for that kind of behavior instead. And and the West is now switch to that only because of the courage and Ingenuity of the Ukrainian people, the Ukrainian resistance.
To Russian aggression was one of the greatest gifts. The West has ever received the sacrifices that the ukrainians are make right. Now, as we speak meaning, they're fighting a war by themselves against a major military power, their neighbor, Russia.
Nobody's fighting it with them. Yes. We are giving them weapons. So they can conduct self-defense, which by the way, is legal under international law.
Unlike the Russian invasion which is illegal under international law. Western Supply of weapons, including heavy weapons including offensive weapons to Ukraine for its self-defense in The Invasion, by Russia is actually legal underwent. And so thank God, the ukrainians surprised everybody. They surprised me, they surprised Putin and the Kremlin, they surprised the B Administration. They surprised the European Union. Not
With the fact that they would resist, we knew that we had the orange revolution in 2004. We had my Don in 2013-14 where they rose up against a domestic Tyrant and they were willing to die on behalf of their country. Then let alone against the foreign Tyrant invading their country. Right. So we knew they would resist. We didn't know just how successful certainly I didn't know they would be on the battlefield.
It's been breathtaking to watch, that's sacrifice that gift enabled, the West to ReDiscover itself, to ReDiscover. Its power, to revive itself. To say the hell with this energy, dependence in the long-term, the hell would this money laundering and reputation laundering? The hell with this running back and forth to Moscow, to try to see what Putin needs in order for him to feel respected. What appeasement he needs, right? So so we'll see if it indoors.
But this shift comes from the ukrainians, and so it's no longer getting away with murder looks and we thank the ukrainians for
that. The people in the leadership and the, the separate factions that make up Ukraine. Uniting the is the unification. The uniting, against the common enemy. Yes, standing up before anyone knew that they would be backed by all of these other nations by this money, and all this kind of stuff standing there.
Are especially with the president, is the one ski where it makes total sense to flee. He stood his ground
and let's take that point that you just raised which is a deep and fundamental point. And I thank you for that.
Do you guys hear that though? I think that was a compliment. There we go. Let's go likes.
It's the last year unification. What I'm sitting here in front of you think it's an honor and and it's a mutual on. So Ukraine before
War is run by a TV production company.
Right, you are one guy running this fantastic. Incredible podcast. There's 20 guys are so running a country, the size of Ukraine and and one's a producer and ones like a makeup person and one's a video editor and they're fantastically talented people, if your country is a TV production. So before the war zalenski had what 25 percent approval rating and he couldn't get much done and it wasn't working.
He got elected with 73% as you know, and then he was down to two, that's a pretty big drop. And so you're thinking maybe having a major large size, 40 million plus population European country run by a TV production company, is not the best choice. And then what do we see? We see President solinsky decides to risk his life on behalf of his country. Ukraine. He decides to stay in.
In the capital, he's not going to flee heat. They're going to stay and fight and he could be killed. He can die. It's a decision where he put his life on the line.
Obviously, he's Jewish descent russian-speaking, childhood and upbringing russian-speaking, Jewish descent puts his life on the line for the country of Ukraine. It's a pretty big message, don't you think? And it's crucial and it turns out, not only that legs, but they're good at TV. They're good at information war and in a war, it's a TV.
Induction company and a TV personality those. That's exactly what you want. Running a country because they're crushing in the information war and he spectacular European Parliament. US Congress Israeli Parliament. There's no room on Zoom. Let alone in person that he can't win over. He's just so effective. You know, this is the first time reality TV has been about reality.
Instead of fake reality TV is just this completely fake nonsense, but zalenski, this is real reality TV and and and he means it and and the nation is behind him and and they're just as courageous and just as ingenious in many ways, and it's spectacular. And so yeah who saw that coming I didn't see that coming legs. In fact the by didn't we talk about Putin's? Miscalculation the bye.
It Administration, as you alluded, to offered him an exit from the country. They didn't say, you know, you want to stand and fight will back you. They said we'll get you out. You want to come now and famously, you know, that quote, right what he said about, how he doesn't need a ride. Remember that? Yeah. Moment. The Biden ministration was poised to do another Afghanistan moment that ignominious exit from
Stan was almost what happened in Ukraine, when by the administration offered him that ride out of there and fortunately, he declined and helped rally in the people from below. Also, rallied to stop the Invader without the presidency and without the government in Ukraine, saving the Biden ministration and and European leaders who latched on. Fortunately, they had the presence of mind to latch onto this gift. Thus, this
Bravery and in geniusness of solinsky and the rest of the ukrainians and flipped and decided to support Ukraine's resistance, you know, first with 5000 helmets only as the Germans initially promised and now with really heavy weapons. And so, that's something that wasn't foreseen. I certainly didn't foresee that, I foresaw the Ukrainian Society being courageous and resisting, but I didn't foresee.
See a television production company being exactly what you want to run a country in a war. A presidents zalenski willing to sacrifice lay down his life and rallying others in the country to do that and then the country being so effective, not just at a courage, but at Battlefield resistance to the Russian invasion, so I stand corrected by the ukrainians, and I'm ecstatic that.
Didn't that I was wrong that I was proven wrong.
And like I said, there's clear factions of the West and the east of Ukraine. And here's a person that like you said, was in the high 20s low 30s percentage approval in the country before the war and now was able to use 90s in the
90s. He's in the ninety percent approval rating. I mean, I think they stopped doing the polling once he hit 91.
Ascent or whatever. It was in the previous poll. I think they all understood that that for now. They didn't need any more polling, that it's pretty clear the nation. So 25 percent to ninety something percent and, and just like the 25% was deserved. The 90-something percent is also deserved fully deserved.
And the question is, how that all stabilizes. It feels like this set of events. I may be paying attention to Twitter too much.
Which is a concern of mine. Whether the change I see is just surface level or deep level, but it seems like we're in a new world. There's something dramatic has shifted that this power that's rooted in mean in your study, it of the 20th century is so deeply rooted in history. There's this power center of the world is now going to, is it
Has been shaken by this event and how that changes the world. This is unclear. It's unclear what lesson China learns from watching. This will lessen in dealers watching. This both Nations as far as you can get polls about Chinese population, but both nations are largely supportive, Putin. So Russia, India and China are still supporting of Putin
quietly. I would maybe elaborate a little bit.
On that point, Lex. I think you're right. The feeling that we're in an inflection moment, you know, an inflection point. I think that's why it spread and I think it's widespread for good reason we might be, but I also share your, let's say modesty about where it's going. And how hard it is to predict where this might go. It's only an inflection point.
If the trends continue, right? If the trends in door, there are plenty of non inflection points. After 9/11. The whole world, rallied around the United States after it was attacked after the bombing of the towers here in New York City and the hitting of the Pentagon and and that didn't last. But it was not really an inflection point, was it, it felt like it might be, but it wasn't. And so this is not a comparable.
In terms of what happened, but it has the feeling that it might be a watershed and maybe will squander it the way we squandered. The post 9/11 rallying around the United States. Maybe we'll actually consolidate it and it will endure, or maybe it'll endured despite ourselves, and we can't tell. We can't know yet and it depends in part on what we do and what we don't do. But here's a few things.
Things that we understand already.
The idea that the West Was in Decline and that the rest of the world had risen and was more powerful and that we lived in a multipolar world that turns out to be empirically false.
It's not true. I mean, it's just factually not true. There are no major important multinational institutions organizations that are run on behalf of were led by a South African a Nigerian person from India. Even the Chinese. Don't run. These institutions. They would like to and they're trying, but they don't. And so,
Whoever you pick the IMF, the World Bank.
The Federal Reserve, which is the most powerful multinational institution, which is actually only a domestic institution and doesn't have a legal mandate to act multilaterally. But does it's got the most power of any institution in the world. NATO the bilateral Alliance is that the US has up and down, Asia, what organizations that have tremendous leverage on the International System.
The international order are non-western.
The UN is the most incompetent and of course, we know that the five it has five members of the security Council where the veto one of which is Russia, one of which is China and the others are the US Britain and France. Not India, not South Africa.
Not Indonesia. Not all of these other countries where the people live, right? The bulk of the population of the world. And where the population is growing like on the African continent. So it's not a multipolar world. We talked already about the International Financial system. That's the Western not multipolar. We talked about the US military in NATO, we could talk about the Japanese military, which is just very formidable enormous number of platforms.
Even the Australian military we could talk about blacks, right? And so, it's a western dominated world. And the West remember is not a geographic concept. It is an Institutional and values Club. The Japanese are not European, but their Western just like Russia is European, but not Western because European is a cultural category and Western is an Institutional category.
You have rule of law, and separation of powers and free and open public sphere, and dynamic open market economy. Okay, and then we have another thing, which is pretty clear. The West is powerfully resented. Powerfully envied and admired simultaneously, PJ O'Rourke, the comedian. Who died this year? Fantastic. It was a big loss for the culture. He said there were two things.
Set are always characteristic of any American Embassy. Abroad one is a political protest outside and the other is the longest line you've ever seen for visas.
And those things are true simultaneously and that's the world. We live in, meaning that non-western countries envy and admire the west but the also resent the power of the West Western hypocrisy, right? The West invades countries when it wants but when others do that, it's illegal. All right, the West arrests, you for money.
Laundering, but it's Western money laundering. That's is where you go when you need to launder money, right? So they see the hypocrisy. They see the excessive power that the West has and they resent it and they say you who elected you to run the world. We have a billion plus people or we have a 200 plus million people and we don't have a say
You're the self-appointed Guardians of our world who did that? And so it's incumbent on the west. Not only to remember the power that it has but also to exercise that power legally and with restraint and also to think about how it can expand institutions to be more encompassing so that other parts of the world are not on the outside.
Being dictated to.
But instead are on the inside too often, right? Western power is not consultative in a decision-making fashion. Its consultative, after the fact, okay, you know, we got together in the EU or we got together in NATO, or we got together at the Federal Reserve and here's our decision and we're announcing it today. And so your economy gets destroyed because the
Reserve. Decides it has to raise interest rates or you. Now, go into default. You can't pay your debt because Western Banks, lend you money and now the West has changed interest rates or other considerations and you're in big trouble now. And so this is something which we fail to address. It's very hard to address. It's very hard to reform. International institutions.
It's very hard to share power. It's very hard to acknowledge that you have too much power. And that may be having too much power. Is not good. Not only for the rest of the world, but for yourself. And so it's great to ReDiscover the west and ReDiscover its values, and ReDiscover its Authority, and credibility, and power, but it's that's not sufficient. So, we know this. Now we know that the rest of the world
Is not necessarily jumping on the western band wagon right to condemn Russia for its actions because the West can do things like sanction, your Central Bank. Take away your reserves deny you technology. It pretty much can do whatever it wants, and it can say that it's legal and it can go through various mechanisms and and it can freeze your property. And, and you say to yourself, should anybody have that much power?
Or and when do they come after me? Now? There's a caveat here and the caveat likes is they don't like the West having all of that power and they didn't join in the condemnation of Russia, but they also didn't join in Russia's aggression. So Russia's domestic civilian airspace aircraft in the
String. Right? Civilian aircraft industry is in big trouble now, because of the export controls on spare parts and software Brazil is a major power in aircraft. Manufacturing, the day rush in and say, you know, Vladimir Putin, we didn't condemn necessarily your actions in Ukraine. Okay, that's one thing. And how about we give you all of our aircraft?
Knology and we help you rebuild your domestic aircraft industry and you can have the aviation that the West is not that that happened. Lex didn't happen. And you can look at India, and you can look at China and you can look at South Africa, and you can look at what they've done in Practical terms. Yes. They haven't. Always joined in a full-throated. Condemnation. Maybe they've been neutral or maybe they've been playing both sides of the fence like turkey. For example.
But are they rushing in to join Russia to join, Russia's aggression to supply, and they are in the answer is no. And the answer is no for two reasons. One. They actually don't want to be party to that and to they understand that Western power and and they don't want to be on the receiving End by crossing the west, and then getting caught up in a sanctions regime will worse.
Can we go to the mine?
Vladimir Putin, because what you just said, China, India, they seem to sit back and say, we're not going to condemn the actions, Vladimir Putin and Russia, but we would really like, for this war to be over. So, there's that kind of energy of we don't just stop this because you're putting us in a very, very bad position. And yet Vladimir Putin is continuing the aggression. What is he thinking? What?
Information is you getting, is that the system that you've described of authoritarian regimes that corrupts your flow of information, your ability to make clear how to decisions just as a human being. When you go to sleep at night, is he not able to see the world clearly or is this all deliberate systematic action that does have some reason behind
it. We got to talk a little bit about China to but let's answer your Putin question directly.
So on Twitter, you've lost the war.
Or as they say, you know, there are these two Russian soldiers having a smoke in Warsaw.
And another, they're taking a break, having a smoke and they're sitting there in Warsaw on top of their tank and one says to the other. Yeah, you know, we lost the information War.
And there they are sitting in Warsaw having that smoke, right?
So yeah, on Twitter Russia has completely lost the war in reality. They fail to take Kiev, they fail to capture Kiev and they failed in Phase 2 as they called it or Plan. B, which is to capture the entirety of the Dawn boss. We're three months into the war. If you had made a judgment about, let's say the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union. A definitive judgment after three months. You might have got the outcome wrong there if
You are judge the winner War, the nineteen thirty-nine forty Soviet invasion of Finland. After three months. You would have got that wrong to of what the outcome was going to be. So we're early in the game here and we have to be careful about any definitive judgments, but it is the case that so far they fail to take Kiev and they failed to capture the entirety of the Dawn bus, luhansk, and Donetsk provinces eastern, Ukraine.
A part of eastern Ukraine, and they've been driven out of kharkiv and the area immediately surrounding heart Keefe. They never captured heart, keep but they came close, but now the ukrainians drove them back to the Russian Border in that very large and important region. So those look like Battlefield losses that are impossible to explain away. If you're the regime in Russia, except by suppression of information.
And as you know, from Russian history, likes leaders in Russia have an easier time with a state of Siege and deprivation then they do with explaining a lost War. But let's look at some other facts that are important to take into account.
One, the Russian army has penetrated father into Ukrainian territory since February 20, 22, including in kherson region, the famous Mario people siege that just ended. They have built a large presence in areas north of Crimea on the sea of azov.
The Black Sea littoral ultimately that they didn't previously, hold.
They're still fighting in luhansk for full control over at least half of the Don boss and ukrainians are resisting fiercely, but nonetheless, you can say that they've been driven out on the contrary father. Penetration than the beginning. Ukraine doesn't have any Kana me anymore?
They have somewhere between 33 and fifty percent. Unemployment. It's hard to measure unemployment in a war economy. But their metallurgical industry that azoff style steel plant in mariupol is a ruin now and a lot of farmers are not planting the fields because the Harvest from the previous year. Still hasn't been sent sold abroad because the ports are blockaded or destroyed.
And so you don't have any Kana me and you need 5 billion or 7 billion or 8 billion dollars a month.
It to meet your payroll.
To feed your people to keep your Army in the field. That's a lot of money per month. And that's indefinite. That's as long as this blockade lasts. And so you don't have any Kana me anymore, your Indigent. And even if you take the lower number five billion as opposed to zalenski asked for 7 billion, five billion is 60 billion a year. That's 60 billion this year. That's 60 billion next year. And so who's got that kind of money? Which Western
It's payers are ready. And if you use the seven or eight billion, you get up to 100 billion a year, the Biden, just signed the B President, Joe Biden, just signed the bill, making it law. Forty billion dollars in Aid. To Ukraine is just an enormous sum, the economic piece of that is a month and a half two months of ukrainians covering, Ukrainian.
And the teachers that's it and that they're asking the G7. They're asking everybody for the so you have no economy and no Prospect of an economy until you evict the Russians from your territory.
And then you have a western Unity, Western resolve it lasts or it doesn't last Lex. So your President Putin and you've got more territory than before and you've got a Stranglehold over the Ukrainian economy, and you've got a lot of the world neutral and you've got the Chinese propaganda supporting you to the hilt.
With those Oliver Stone and mearsheimer lines about how this is really NATO's fault. And you've got Hungary dragging its feet on the oil embargo against Russia and you got turkey dragging its feet on the recent applications of Sweden and Finland for NATO. Expand, you're saying to yourself, Lex. Maybe I can ride this out. I got a lot of problems of my own and we can go into the details on the Russian side.
Challenges. But he's got, he's on Ukrainian territory unless he's evicted and he's got a Stranglehold on their economy. And he's got the possibility that the West doesn't stay resolved and doesn't continue to pay for Ukraine's economy or Supply those heavy weapons. And so you could argue that, maybe he's deluded about all of this and maybe he should go on Twitter. You know, I'm not on Twitter.
Her. But maybe Putin, who famously doesn't use the internet. Should go on Twitter and see, he's losing the war or you can argue that maybe he's calculating here that he's got a chance to still prevail.
Wow, that is Darkly insightful. If I could go to Henry Kissinger for a brief moment and people should read this op-ed. He wrote In The Washington Post in March 5th, 2014 after the start of the war between Russia and Ukraine, but before Crimea was annexed. There's a lot of interesting historical description about the division Within.
In Ukraine, the corruption within Ukraine that will, if people read this article will give context to how incredible it is. Was Alaska was able to accomplish in uniting the country, but I just want to comment just Henry. Kissinger's interesting figure in American history. He opens the article with in my life. I have seen four Wars begun with great enthusiasm and public support, all of, which we did not know how to end. And from three of which
You withdrew unilaterally, the test of policy is How It Ends not how it begins. So he's giving this cold hard truth that we get. We going towards excited are able to send 40 billion dollars financial aid, military aid, our own men and women, but the excitement Fades. Twitter, outraged Fades. And then
When a country that's willing to wait, patiently is is willing to pay the cost of seeds versus the cost of explaining to its own people of the war is lost that country, just might win.
Outlast, let's hope not because ukrainians resistance deserves to Prevail here, Russia deserves to lose. No war of aggression. Like they've committed here against Ukraine should Prevail if we can do anything about it. I support 1000% the continued supply of heavy weapons including offensive weapons to the ukrainians.
Long as they're willing to resist and it's their choice. It's their choice when to negotiate, it's their choice. How much to resist? It's their choice. What kind of sacrifices to make? And it's our responsibility to meet their requests more quickly than we have so far in a greater scale.
But ultimately wars only have political ends, they never have military ends. You need a political solution here. So if the ukrainians are able to conduct a successful counteroffensive, its scale,
In July or August whenever they launch right now, the heavy weapons are coming in and they're being moved to the battlefield and more are coming. You know, the dynamic Russia bombs a school, Russia bombs a hospital, Americans and Europeans decide to send even more heavy weapons to Ukraine, right? That's the self-defeating Dynamic. From the Russian side. They commit the atrocities. We send more heavy weapons.
Once those heavy weapons around the battle lines will see if ukrainians cannot just defend,
which they've proven, they're
able to do in breathtaking fashion. Not just conduct counter-attacks where the enemy moves forward and you cut behind the enemy's lines and you counter-attack and push the enemy back a little bit. But whether you can evict the Russians from your territory with a
Combined arms operation where you have a massive superiority in infantry and heavy weapons, but more importantly, you coordinate your air, power your tanks, your drones, your infantry at scale, which is something that ukrainians have not done yet. It's something the Russians failed at in Ukraine. When they come from the same place, the Soviet military. We hope this Ukrainian counteroffensive. Its scale is combined arms operations.
Ation succeeds, and if it does succeed, there's the possibility of a battlefield Victory. Whether that also includes Crimea.
Which as you know, is not hostile on the contrary to the Russian military remains to be seen, but but however much they regain territorially back towards the 1991 borders, which is their goal their stated goal, and which we support them properly in trying to achieve however much they achieve of that in this counter-offensive that we're anticipating.
That will set the stage for the next phase and either Russia. The, which is to say one person. Vladimir Putin will acknowledge that he's lost the war because the ukrainians wanted on the battlefield or he'll try to announce a full-scale mobilization conscript, the whole country, go back and instead of acknowledging defeat try to win with a different plan.
Remains to be seen, will the ukrainians negotiate any territory away or must they capture. Also Crimea which puts a very high bar on the went on the summer counteroffensive that we're going to see which could last through the fall and into the winter as a result. We don't know the answers to that. Nobody knows the answers to that. People are guessing, some people are better informed because they have inside intelligence.
People are also worried about Russian escalation to nuclear weapons or chemical weapons. If they begin to lose on the battlefield to Ukraine,
are you worried about nuclear war the possibility of nuclear
war? I think it's necessary to pay attention to that possibility, that possibility existed before the February 20 22, full-blown invasion of Ukraine. The Doomsday are
So now that Russia possesses is enough to destroy the world many times over and that's been the case every year since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. And so of course, we're concerned about that. We do know, however, Lex that they have a system known as dual key. Dual key for the Strategic nuclear weapons. The Strategic nuclear weapons means the ones fired from silos.
As the missiles, the ones delivered from bombers or the ones fired from submarines,
right? And there are ready to
go there, InterContinental. We watch that very, very closely. We watch all the movement of that and the alerts and Etc. We have tremendously. Let's say tremendous Insight Intelligence on that, but dual key means that President Putin alone cannot fire them. He has one key, which he must insert, you must
Insert the codes for a command to launch that then goes to the head of the general staff, who must has his own key and separate codes and must do the same insert that key in codes for them to launch. And so will the general staff Chief go along with the destruction of the world, over a battlefield loss in Ukraine.
I don't know the answer to that and I don't know if anybody knows the answer to that. Will those people flying those bombers if they get the order from, if the Dual Key System goes into action and both keys are used in. All the codes are are implemented. Will those young guys fly in those bombers? Let those bombs go will those at the missile silos decide to engage and fire. We don't know, but you can see that.
More than one man making the decision here in a system of strategic nuclear weapons. As far as the Tactical, the so-called low yield or Battlefield nuclear weapons. We're not sure the system that they have in Russia, these days for their Implement, for their use of such tactical nuclear
weapons.
It could well be that that Putin and just himself.
He alone can fire them or order them be fired.
But you know, Lex there's no tactical nuclear weapon fired at Ukraine. That's not also fired simultaneously at Russia.
If the Kremlin is 600 miles from Ukraine and if the wind changes direction or the wind happens to be blowing east-northeast, the Fallout hits your Kremlin, not just Ukraine. Moreover. You have all those border regions which are staging regions for the Russian offensive, and there are a lot closer than 600 miles. There are actually right there. And so you fire that weapon.
Been on Ukrainian territory and you can get the Fallout just like the Chernobyl Fallout spread to Sweden, which is how we got the Kremlin to finally first. They denied, they said, oh, we don't know why there's a big nuclear Cloud over Sweden. We don't know where that came from, but eventually, they admitted it. So Russia can actually use a nuclear weapon tactical. Battlefield, one in Ukraine without also firing it at it.
Itself, and in addition, it's that same Dynamic I alluded to earlier, which is to say, you bomb a hospital, you bomb a school. There's more heavy weapons going to Ukraine from the West.
You can't get away with any of the. There's always going to be response to see the proportional or greater than proportional.
You could well have Europe signing on to Nato direct engagement, both Washington or boy and Brussels.
Engagement of the Russian army on the territory of
Ukraine. You think that's possible to do that without dramatic escalation from the Russian
side. Yes. I do think it's possible but it's very worrisome. Just like you're saying but what if Putin were to escalate like that? He's firing that weapon at himself and he's potentially provoking a direct clash with NATO's military. Not just with the
in military, if you're sitting in the Kremlin looking at those charts likes of NATO capabilities and you can't conquer Ukraine, which didn't really have heavy weapons before February 20, 22 at scale and you're thinking. Okay? Now, I'm going to take on NATO,
That would be a bold step on the part of a Russian leader and end. And let's also remember, Lex that there's another variable here. You're a desperate, as long as everyone implements your orders.
And so if people start to say quietly not necessarily publicly. I may not Implement that order because that's maybe a criminal order or my grandma is Ukrainian. Or my wife is Ukrainian.
Or I don't want to go to the hog. I don't want to spend the rest of my life in the hog or whatever. It might be at any point along the chain of command from the general staff all the way down, right? To the platoon. You're a desperate provided. They Implement your orders, but who's to say?
That somewhere along the chain of command, people start to say, you know, I'm going to ignore that order. Or I'm going to sabotage that order, or I'm going to flee the battlefield or I'm going to injure myself so that I don't have to fight, or I'm going to join the Ukrainian side and so it could be, that's what's left of the Russian army in the field, begins to disintegrate.
If the ukrainians are not able to mount that counter-offensive, it scale that combined arms, operation, the Russian military in the field, which is taken, horrendous. Casualties. As far as we understand something, like a third of the original Force. So you're talking about 50 to 60,000 that includes both dead and wounded. To the point of being unable to return to the battlefield was a big numbers. Those are a lot of
He's a lot of families affected their sons, or their husbands or their fathers are either missing in action or the regime won't tell them that they're dead. As you know, from the sinking of that Flagship moskva right by the ukrainians. And so a disintegration of the Russian military because there are orders that they either can't implement or don't want to. Implement is also
Not excluded. And so you have these two big variables Ukrainian Army in the field and its ability to move from defense to offense at scale. And we're going to test that soon. And then the Russian nobility in the field to hold together in a war of conquest and aggression where they're they're conscripts, or they're fed dog food or or they don't have any weapons anymore, because there's no resupply.
And so, the disintegration of the army can't be excluded. And then of course, all bets are off on the Putin regime more long-term. There are these technology export controls. We were talking about how the military industrial complex and Russia is dependent on foreign component, parts and software. And so if you have export controls and you have firms voluntarily, even when they don't fall other export controls leaving,
Russian business refusing to do business with Russia. And we see this not just in the civilian sector like with McDonald's or many other companies. We see this in the key areas like the oil industry, with the executives fleeing. That is the Western Executives fleeing giving up their positions. So Russia's ability to resupply its tanks resupply its missiles.
Apply its uniforms resupply, its food to its soldiers, in the field and and then their boots. We see a lot of stuff under tremendous stress. And in the long term, there's no obvious way. They can rebuild the military industrial complex to produce those weapons because they're reliant on foreign parts that they can't get any more in. There are no domestic substitutes on the
Horizon that's at the earliest, a two-year proposition to have domestic substitutes and for some things like micro Electronics, they've never had domestic substitutes going back to the Soviet times as you know, well, and so there's that pressure on Russia from the technology export controls, which if you're in the security Ministry or the defense Ministry of you're in that side of the of the regime, you
feeling that pain as we speak and you're wondering about the strategy.
Let me ask you about Again, The Echoes of history and it frustrates me in part when people draw these parallels, but maybe there is some deep insight about those parallels. So, there's there's a song that goes that's is that over Union of Nastasia sake of by being I'm a beautician initialized by now. So the the in operation Barbarossa the bombing of key.
Of by Hitler, there is sort of an eerie parallel.
And you have to be extremely careful drawing such parallels and such connections to this unexplainable war in that is World War Two. But is there are elements of this that do echo in the actions of Vladimir Putin and more specifically. Do you think the Vladimir Putin is a war criminal?
Can that label be assigned to the actions of this man?
O war. Criminal is a legal determination and it requires evidence and due process and the ability to defend oneself. We don't just decide in the twittersphere or on a podcast that somebody is a war criminal.
They can be a suspected war criminal and we can gather evidence to try to prosecute that case and then the issue for us Lexus. Which court does it go to.
What's the appropriate Place? Does it happen in Ukraine? Because they're the victims, does it happen in the hog? Because there's an international criminal court there. Does it happen inside Russia? Because there's regime change at some point and some of these people become let's say they get arrested by their own people inside Russia.
So those are all important questions that have to be pursued with resources and with determination and and by skilled people who are excellent at Gathering that evidence and that process is underway, and Ukraine has a trial underway. Now of One alleged war, criminal who's pleaded guilty, and we'll see what the outcome of that trial inside. Ukraine is of a lower level official, not obviously.
Putin, but the commander of a tank group.
So yes, the names are eerily familiar.
He's Zoom hard Keef.
Give right. Those are the names. We know from the Nazi invasion and the Nazi occupation of Ukraine, and it's very deeply troubling to think that this could happen again, and there's a bizarre sense that the Russians claiming as Putin says 2D not safai. Ukraine have invaded the same places that the Nazis invaded.
Back in
1941 as somebody who's working on volume, 3 of your work on style and going through this period, is it Eerie to you? Yes, it is Lex that you're,
I've written the chapters of volume 3. I've drafted. The chapters on the war.
And as I say the place names are very evocative, unfortunately, but but, you know, the Nazis failed ultimately.
They captured Ukraine for a time, but they were evicted from Ukraine and it was massive partisan or guerrilla warfare resistance behind Nazi lines the whole time that they were allegedly in control of Ukraine. If you look at the maps on cable TV, they show you the sign of Rush, the show you the coloring Russian control and they draw a line and then it's colored in.
The word control is misplaced.
They're not actually control it. It's Russian claimed or or extent of farthest Russian troop advancement, because behind the Russian lines and Ukraine, Crimea accepted, you have insurgencies. You have the armed Insurgency, in melito people, for example, which is a place that, you know, in Southeastern Ukraine. There is a guerrilla War now underway to hurt the Russian.
Those who are in occupation of that City and region and we're going to see that continue even if the war becomes a stalemate even if it's stalemates more or less at the lines. We're at now which would mean that anticipated Ukrainian counteroffensive, its scale, proves unsuccessful. The Russian army doesn't disintegrate and you end up with a
Stalemate where there could be a ceasefire or not a ceasefire, but neither side is attempting an offensive for the time being. They will be resistance behind those Russian lines and it will be fierce resistance, the kind of resistance. We saw to the Nazi occupation. Ultimately it took the Red Army re invading the territory of Ukraine and succeeding at combined operate arms operations at
Gail a massive counter-offensive much larger than anything we're talking about today. Ultimately. It required that to evict the Nazis from Ukraine. But in the meantime, they did not have an easy occupation regime there.
Ukrainian partisans. Soviet partisans, killed Nazi officials very mock soldiers. Ver mocked officers blew up the infrastructure. They were using made them pay a price for their occupation. We could well see if unfortunately this ends in a stalemate for the time being we could well see that type of uncertainties.
Urgency gain momentum behind Russian lines and and try to evict the Russians that way.
And then remount the counter-offensive its scale later on in the future if the first one doesn't succeed. So that would be further Echoes
of the World War Two
experience. The scale once again, is much smaller. The size of the Army's here. They're not in the many hundred, eight hundred thousand seven hundred thousand a million to a million for, that's not what we're talking about today, but the weapons
The cruise missiles right
artillery fire, you know artillery fire used to be very inaccurate and it was like saturation. You would just fire towards the Enemy Lines and if you hit something you hit something and if you didn't you just kept firing. Now you have drones flex and so artillery fire is now sniper fire.
Because you can coordinate the direction of the artillery. Fire with the drones. The drones can take a picture and show you where the enemy is precisely located and you can align that artillery to hit them instead of just in discriminately bombing, an area of territory and the NATO. Supplied artillery goes really far and you can fire into Russian positions and yourself, not be exposed.
Two Russian fire because your artillery fires father. Then there's so that's coming and we're going to see that in action. And so the scale is not the same, but the weapons, the Precision of some of the weapons. In some of the NATO. We're not sending all of our stuff. But as I said, the dynamic is Russia, commits atrocities, Russia bomb schools, Russia bombs hospitals, Russia, kill civilians and more.
Heavier and more lethal, Western weapons. Go to Ukraine their willingness to risk. Their lives is really so impressive. And the reason that we, it's it's our duty. We're obliged to supply those weapons. And so the Russians don't have that resupply and the ukrainians do and so the Russians are now digging in Lex. They're dealing in deeply in the areas that they've penetrated.
And they're trying to build unassailable positions.
Went for when the ukrainians transition from Mostly defense to full-scale offense and we'll see if that now. I mean they're digging everywhere, you know, as they say, copilot compiled right there. Digging everywhere behind your Russian is beautiful. Digging in. I wish Flex like yours, but so so there are these things that we can't predict. But there are these things were watching and watching closely.
And on top of that, something that's not in WWII, or for the most part of cyber attacks and cyber warfare, which is much less perhaps convertible into human words, because it happens so quickly. It's large scales. So difficult to trace and all those kinds of things. It's not bullets, its electrical signals
in the dance, but those Ukrainian people there, like you Lex
When they're young, and they're technically really proficient and they've been amazing, you know, they spent those teenage years in the basement playing video games, not guns out. It's useful. After all it turns out. It's more than useful. You can save your country that way and so they're not alone. They're getting support and that support is important, but really predominantly its ukrainians on the Cyber Battlefield.
And their skills have been very impressive and they've been preparing for this for a number of years and they have a whole Army of young people on the Cyber side. It's their civilian population. These are not people conscripted into the military or volunteering wearing the uniform and so even in cyber warfare that ukrainians have been extremely impressive. And so let's remember that all of these aspects of warfare.
Whether it's how far your cruise missiles go and how accurate, they are. What size, your cyber capabilities are. And it's really ultimately about the people. It's about the human capital, right? It's about their willingness, their skill level, but also their willingness to fight, and to put their lives on the line, and there's no substitute for that. And so, what's called morale?
Or courage or bravery your Valour. That's really the ultimately decisive provided you have enough. Sufficient arms right to conduct the fight. And if you don't you use a Molotov cocktail, right? Grandma calls in the coordinates of the Russian tank on her iPhone. And you have a Molotov cocktail that the people who used to work in the cafeteria.
Are now stuffing flammable liquid into bottles and you carry one right up to the tank and you smash it against the tanker, your drop it in, one of the hatches in the tank, right? That there's no substitute for that kind of stuff that that level of resolve willingness to die for your country. That's a really big lesson that we need to absorb in our own country. We've been going to war more frequently than we should.
And like you said without the justification, all the time. And then like Henry Kissinger said, without understanding how this was going to end. It's easy to start a war. It's very difficult to win a war Prevail in a war and the war on terms that that meet your original expectations, right? We've been fighting Wars, but we haven't been fighting Wars as as societies. We've been fighting Wars as a small sliver of our population.
Something like 1% of our population is involved with the military because we have an all-volunteer force and that means that it's easier for our politicians to go to war because they don't face conscription. They don't fade. They don't have the draft which affects every family in the country and because
The number of people in the volunteer force is such a narrow stratum of the population. And so they've been getting away with this because the professional Army is much better than the conscript Army and an all-volunteer force is much preferable from a military point of view. We're from a societal point of view.
It enables you to go to war too easily as a politician, and it doesn't engage the society. The same way that the Ukrainian Society is completely engaged from those young hackers all the way up, to those
grandmother's. Let me ask you, you're a scholar of history is collared. Geopolitics.
And you're also human being,
that's kind of you likes. I'll take that.
What's the value? What's the Hope was the power of conversation here. If you could sit down with Vladimir Putin and have a conversation versus bullets, human exchange words. Is there. Hope for those and if so, what would you talk about? What would you ask him?
Well, Henry Kissinger, you alluded to his op-ed. He's had many private meetings with President Putin.
Over over a long time and President Biden. The previous presidents secretaries of State.
Officials below Secretary of State, the head of the CIA evidently met with President Putin. In the fall when he was massing the troops on the border before he invaded and we sent the head of the CIA and Putin received him. Somebody he evidently respects or was at least willing to meet unlike other members of the administration. So a lot of people are talking to him in some
More another for the 22 years. He's been in power.
And I'm not sure it's had what I would call their desired
effect. Well, the nature of the conversation is interesting to and also the timing, which is post. February 22nd is a different time and also another aspect.
Which Oliver Stone mentioned. Interestingly, that there's something about covid and the pandemic that creates isolation. The distancing is to such a silly little Nuance thing, but maybe it's actually has a profound impact on the human being the human mind of Vladimir Putin. That there is something about an in-person meeting and not across the table. That's far too large. Yes, but sort of the intimacy of one human to Human.
An in-person conversation that there's something distinctly powerful about that, reminder there that as Putin says, in the narrative, in the propaganda that we're all one people. There is truth to that that this entirety of humanity. Yes, you're right people and you kind of reminded by that. When you're sitting together,
people who have sat across the table from him where they're at 30 yards.
Or at 3:00.
Have remarked Upon This Feeling of isolation. Has that has affected him the pandemic. I think there must be something to that. If several people who've been in the room with him, are remarkably on everybody that I know and I've been able to talk to who's had a meeting with him in the past 10
years,
including Henry Kissinger, the former Secretary of State.
Has said that Putin spends a lot of time enumerating his grievances.
He goes through a monologue of his Grievances and then the West did this and then the West lied to us about that. And then the West cheated us on this and so it's not the conversation that you're encouraging of common Humanity.
It's that roiling resentment volcano. That's just exploding and explode the resentment. And and by the time he gets through the monologue of the Grievances. The time of the meeting is expired or over
time. That's brilliant statement, but that's where the skill of conversation comes in. Like when you're facing a bull with the red cloth. You have to learn how to avoid the long list of Grievances and get to the humanity. That's
That's a really important skill, for sure.
It's a skill and it's the highest level skill of a diplomat to be able to reach some type of common understanding when interests and and worldviews Clash so much. But here's your challenge. Lex.
Your challenge is.
Russia wants to impose a closed sphere of influence, on its neighbors. It wants to dictate what its neighbors can and can't do it wants to exert influence, not by the power of its example, not by the freedom of its people, not by the dynamism of its Diversified economy, but it wants to exert influence just because it deserves that.
Because it's a great power, just because an on and on and on, it's a civilization on to itself and it wants that and we can't give that the reason that Russia was not integrated into the West was not for lack of trying.
It was because Russia, ultimately spurned. The integration because it was about what terms the integration would come on. Would you come into the west and observe Western rules and be another country? Meaning, just another country? There's Poland, and there's Austria, and there's little tiny Monaco, and there's, and there's Russia.
And you're just one of those countries and Russia is answer to that was no, we're not just one of those countries. We need special rules. We need special conditions will integrate but only as a special country meaning like at the UN, where all countries are sovereign, all countries are members. But Russia has a veto on what countries can and can't do those were the terms.
On which they were willing to integrate. And those were the terms that no leader of a Western Country or the United States or the G7 or fill-in-the-blank can grant to Russia.
It's very well known that Vladimir Putin was one of the first may be the first person first leader, far needed to call President Bush after the 9/11 tragedy. They didn't connect right away. President Bush was not in Washington and but eventually they did speak. He condemned the terrorist attack. He offered Russian support, which he delivered on the use of some Russian logistics for our
Afghanistan operations. And a lot of people point to that and they say there it is. Russia wanted to cooperate and did cooperate, and we spurn them or we fail to appreciate Russia's cooperation. And so, therefore, Russia was cheated or Russia was lied to or Russia's grievances are legitimate. But here's the problem with that argument Lex.
In exchange for that support. Vladimir Putin asked in return from President Bush for a free hand, in the former Soviet space that closed hierarchical sphere of influence where Russia would exert influence coercively over countries that were Sovereign and no American president.
Could grant that and President. Bush was right? He said no. And so the attempted cooperation blew up, but who's at fault? There? Should there be
A non-voluntary sphere of influence. Should that be granted or should you face up to attempts to do that? You know, let's take a little detour here into China for a second.
China. Had this. Brilliant Grand strategy.
Which was sure America is hostile because America's hegemonic America wants to control the world. America will never let China rise. America will do everything it can to hold China down. So we're going to have hostility from America. We don't want to decouple because we need that high-end technology transfer either. We buy it or we steal it because America and the rest of the West has all the technology that we need. We have some of it.
Domestically more than before by a lot, but we're still dependent. So we can t couple, so we'll have the hostility, but they'll be aligned. We don't cross just so that we don't lose the technology transfer.
Till made in China, 2035 is accomplished and we're self-sufficient, domestically and Ai and every other area that's critical.
But hostility from America, but we have an Ace in the Hole. Our Ace in the Hole is Europe, Europe hates conflict. They're all about trade. It doesn't matter how evil you are. They love to trade because Von Del door handle change through trade. They have this illusion that you're going to become a better country, if they trade with you, and you won't have conflict war in hostilities if you trade. And so, we have this European Ace in the Hole.
We're hostile with the Americans were still buying or stealing their technology and better than that. Even the Europeans are not hostile to us at all. They love to trade with us and they want to trade more in there. Our biggest trading partner already.
And lo and behold, she jingping sides with Vladimir Putin in the aggression. In Ukraine. He doesn't side with him providing military equipment. He doesn't provide technology transfer, but he provides public support and massive Pro Russian propaganda to the whole Chinese population.
And the Europeans say wait a minute. This is an invasion of a sovereign country in Europe. What do you mean? You're not condemning Vladimir Putin's Invasion? And so that wedge that the Chinese had that was the basis of their grand strategy that wedge between the US and Europe. When it came to China. Policy, that wedge is gone. Now, Xi Jinping, destroyed it and the Europeans and the Americans are coming close together.
On Ukraine and Russia policy for sure, but also more and more on China policy. And so that was a pretty big sacrifice for the Chinese leader to make and what did he get in return?
He gets hydrocarbons from Russia at reduced prices and the Chinese get hydrocarbons from a lot of countries. They have a completely diverse supply chain
for their energies. What do you think is your ping is thinking? No, was it a, was it a mistake?
Or I'd like to know Lex. I'd like you to be able to sit down with him across from this table here on your podcast and pose that same question him because we have no
idea.
Language barrier. That's fascinating. By the way you as a scholar of Stalin. Do you think will ever break through the language barrier to China? Not ever? I apologize in in the next few years because there is a gigantic cultural and language barrier between, then the west and the China
is a great civilization. It is China predates. The United States by Millennia. China's accomplishments of breathtaking, but China's also led by
By, let's be honest, a Communist Party Monopoly which engages in a lot of criminal Behavior. Lex Tibet is Ukraine.
Shin Jang is Ukraine.
Hong Kong is Ukraine.
Let alone support for Putin, you quit. This is before we've even discussed Taiwan. And so, now the Europeans are coming to see this and the Americans are coming to understand this, that may be trading with a regime like that.
And morally politically criminally to bed. Sinkiang Hong Kong. How is that different from what Putin is doing in Ukraine? I'd be hard-pressed to differentiate that ultimately, even though the analogies are not exact. And so the Chinese, it's like that guy Leona. The author of leak. Alethia the the great Memoir of the late Soviet period, the end.
Soviet Union, you know, that they spend all this time and all these resources blackening our image, but we Supply them with endless material to Blacken our image. That's where Xi Jinping regime is right now likes. And so they have a big Dilemma on their side. It's a western world. And they've United the Western World and and re awoken the rest of the world to the fact that
China is a threat to the values, the institutions and values of the West, and that trade is not transforming China quite the opposite. We'll see if this indoors maybe it doesn't endure. Maybe it's a fleeting moment. Maybe this is not an inflection point, maybe the war in Ukraine ends more quickly than we think and maybe like you said, the Chinese and the Indians and the rest of them, the leaders, they are, they get their wish that it ends and
The world moves on and forgets or says. Let's try again to to resume our mutual understanding are mutually, beneficial trade, and everything else. Maybe it's a passing phase. We can't exclude that. I'm very poor at predicting, the future, but the moment is not a good one for the Chinese regime, let alone the fact that he's trying to impose.
An unprecedented in the modern era, third term for himself as president in the fall at the next party Congress. Becoming president for Life. De facto a Mal like figure, and he's now got to do that with in this environment where he has damaged, Chinese Grand strategy and damage the reputation of China and its relationship.
Across the world, maybe not permanently, but significantly, in addition to the problems they have at home demography. As you know, middle income trap and then the regulatory Insanity of Chinese Communist rule that we've seen with the tech companies that you know, well where they've destroyed, all of that value with the blow-up of their property sector, because it was a massive bubble.
And that's still playing out and this time it's the same. Meaning, this time. It's not different when it comes to a property blowout. It has enormous effects on middle-class balance sheets and their ability to, to be to remain, consumers and drive the economy, which is the model that they have to share. So, he's got a Litany of challenges independent, even of the fact that he sided with his
Pal. Vladimir Putin and their Bromance is costing China, very, very significantly if you close your eyes, yes.
And 100 years ago 1922 and you think about the future. I wonder if you can hear the drums of War, predicting the 30s predicting.
The Great Depression and the resentment that builds the economic resentment, the culture was that move the geopolitical resentment, that builds at least the WWII it, at least to me, when I close my eyes. I can hear the drums of war that are still ahead of us and it's possible that we're there, 20:22 will materialize in a similar way as did.
I have my eyes closed.
Lex. Do you hear anything? And I
sure hope that that's not what happened. But I'm looking, I'm 1922. It's an Epoch. I know well and I don't see the future that unfolds I would not have predicted. It. Had I been alive, then I see the war behind us. I see a Prosperity on the horizon. Yes, inflation in Germany, and and so
Some many other difficult issues, but there are more democracies now than there were before the war and the old Empires are gone, and there's a cultural efflorescence and there's modernism in the Arts and and there's women entering the public sphere and there's all this fantastic new technology like Automobiles, and I'm looking at the future from 1922 and and I'm not seeing the Great Depression and I'm not seeing WWII and I'm not seeing the Holocaust.
Because I don't predict the future and nobody in 1922 could see that future although I guess there were some Clairvoyance who predicted it but but you're not one of them. Yeah, I'm not one of them and but but this is what I know Lex from studying history. What I know is stuff happens in other words even site in other words, like we're watching Ukraine war right now.
And all of our attention is focused on that and it's like The Economist say in their textbooks. When they're they're powerful models are employed and there's this line that says all other factors held constant, and then the model works and you get this really great result. It's very powerful predictor and Analysis the model. And and the whole game is all other factors held.
Step.
So the Russia, Ukraine war that we've been discussing in this could happen and that could happen. But you know what stuff could happen next? For example, the Israeli government could decide this Summer, that it's going to bomb Iran? Because no, Israeli, government will tolerate Iran, acquiring a nuclear weapon and since President Trump exited unilaterally exited from the multi Power Nuclear.
Mint Iran is now much closer to the bomb than they were.
When they were still in 20, United States was still in that agreement and you tell me the Israeli government. That says, sure it's fine. It's okay. Iran could get the bomb.
And so maybe that happens and maybe that happens as early as this summer as here on gets closer and closer and closer.
Maybe that guy in North Korea decides. It's his time just like his grandfather right in 1950 decided. You know, it's time. We're going to quote reunify unquote, the Korean peninsula.
Maybe, I don't know. Lex, fill in the blank. Something's gonna happen. It's not going to be what I predict. It's not going to be what I'm watching. It's going to be obvious only after it happens not before and then it's going to upend the table.
And all of a sudden, everything changed was going to be in a different environment, different circumstances and is Ukraine still as Central at that point as it seems to be right now. I don't know the answer to
that question. Let me ask to Rapid Fire questions. You're only allowed to have one minute and it's about predicting the Future. Okay. Question, one Vladimir Putin. When will he no longer be in office?
And will he step down or be overthrown?
What's your prediction and a brief explanation of that prediction? Now? Nobody can predict the future. But what's your sense now? Some people are saying the pressure is building. He's going to be overthrown or step down at the end of this year. And some people say surely. He's going to last Outlast Stalin's rule of 30 plus
years. No evidence of a cool yet.
None whatsoever yet. He's pretty much at life expectancy for a Russian male. Those are bad numbers. He's what? 69 going to be 70. So he's lived the life of a Russian male already, but he's got better doctors than the majority of the Russian males in that. Let's say comparison set so he could.
Could live a very long time with good. Doctors.
So there could be a coup at some point, but there's none today in evidence. He could go because he's reached the life expectancy or he could stay for a long time. The thing to watch about. This is an organization that nobody pays attention to the fso the for, they're all nice lose. But a cranny which is the praetorian guard. The self-standing.
Bodyguard directorate. The only one, the only organization in Russia, that has any access to him. We've seen no disloyalty. No, breaking of ranks node. Affections. Nothing in the public realm in in open sources about any divisions or problems in the fso in the praetorian guard. So if you can't break that, change that
We list it to factions there. You can overturn him. So authoritarian regimes, Lex. They're terrible. They fail at everything they not they can't feed their people. They have trouble achieving any goals. They only have to be good. However, one thing
They only have to be good at the complete suppression of political Alternatives. If you can suppress political Alternatives, you can fail at everything else, but you can survive as an authoritarian regime. So you watched navalny that house that's questionable. That's my second rapid-fire.
Question is what happens to navalny. What are the possible conclusions of will you said quite possibly the second most
So powerful figure in Russia. Is there is he going to die in jail? Will he become the next president of Russia? Well, what are the possible? I
wish I knew like I've been surprised that he's still alive. I've been worried that he will be killed in prison in a staged fight, you know, some security officer prison guard. Puts on a prison outfit.
Takes a lead. Pipe goes into the cell. They have a quote fight and navalny is killed. I've been afraid of that, but he's still alive even though he's serving a long sentence. So that leads me to Guess that people inside the Putin regime and maybe President Putin himself understand that navalny is their ticket to lift sanctions.
That navalny is even more popular outside of Russia than he is inside of Russia. And he's the leader. In many ways of the up political opposition in the country. Even while still in prison, his organization's been destroyed, but it's, he doesn't have majority support in the population by any stretch of the imagination, but he's a big figure in the west including here in the US. And so navalny could be their ticket. They're kind of
Get out of jail card, meaning, they release him from prison. He gets appointed. I don't know, prime minister, even by the Putin regime, if he were willing to accept such a position and I have my doubts about that, and then that's how they Lobby to remove the sanctions against them. So he's a card that President Putin could play and so maybe that's the reason he's still alive, or maybe there are other reasons that we don't know.
And so some alternative to Putin is more likely to arise inside his gang. Puttanesca. Sheikha as they say, right inside his gang where they Tire of his mistakes. They Tire of his self-defeating actions and they say patriotically for Russia. We need to do something against move against this guy because
He's hurting our country and also because I could do better. I'm ambitious, as well as patriotic. But once again, the problem there likes is Putin is surrounded by this cocoon known as the fso. He's he meets on Zoom predominantly with the rest of the government including with the defense and security officials. They don't have frequent access to his person.
And as you were alluding earlier to the pandemic, they have to quarantine for two weeks before every meeting with him. And moreover, you know, Lex, they don't know where he is. You see when they're on Zoom with him and and the room
It's the valdai, his office in the valdai region. Looks the same as his office in Sochi or his office outside of Moscow and Nova are going over there. Made up to look very similar on zoom and sure some signs. They're looking where is it? But maybe they don't know. And so you're gonna move on him and you're going to jump him and his Kremlin out his Dasha.
Outside outside Moscow and it turns out he's in Sochi or vice versa and it turns out the fso is loyal to him and and won't let you anyway. So Lex we don't know but we watch this fso really closely and we think that the the elites, if not Putin, but maybe Putin to understand navalny as a really big potential, political card that they could play. And one last question.
The biggest question, you studied some of the darkest aspects of human history, human nature. Let me ask the why question. What are we doing here? What's the meaning of our existence, our life here on Earth? What do we humans trying to get at here?
I can't answer that question either, but I can't say that having a purposeful life.
Is is actually not that hard.
You can't you're not Gandhi, right? You're not President Roosevelt. You're not going to transform a country or a civilization or become immortal because of your courage and your Insight and your Genius at critical moments.
But you live in an environment, your own a school. You're in a workplace. You're somewhere where you can affect other people in a positive way. It can be not just about yourself, but it can be about them and you can have a positive impact on other people's lives, through the work that you do, whether that's your employment, or your charity, or your spare time or your work time. It can be by modeling.
Your behavior, right? Admitting your mistakes hard to do, but necessary, remembering that you don't know everything. You can't predict the future, but you don't even know everything in your areas of expertise, painfully reminded of that, you Milla T at times, but remind yourself to. So you can lead a life that can show others. What good values are.
And you can lead a life that dedicates yourself not only to your own material well-being, but to the well-being and to the development of others around you and it can be on a humble scale. It can be in a small classroom, or a small workplace, a small work team, but, but it can be done and you can be reminded that having a positive impact. Even on one other person gives far greater meaning to your own life.
And is profoundly satisfying much more satisfying than the attention. You might get. Let's say on social media or Awards, you might receive, there's nothing wrong with pursuing, those people pursue them and it's a free Society.
But leading a purposeful life
intentionally is possible. Even just one person. I love the expression. Say one, life saved the world. Just focusing on the local on the tiny little difference. You can make in the world can somehow
Ripple every day. If you think about that every single day, you're a better person. We're a better
society and maybe you get to add a bit of love.
To the world. After all Steven. This is a huge honor for many reasons, one of, which is that can just tell how much care you put into this conversation. And how much, you know, I use the word love a lot, but I just feel the love that. Just even, the respect you give me which I can't tell you how energized that is. How much that gives me strength for my own silly little
suits. Thank you so much for doing that. Thank you for not just talking today, but given me so much respect, just with everything you're doing is I really appreciate that. Makes me feel special. So thank you so much for sitting down and talking to
this, Mutual likes. Thank you as well. And thank you for the respect that you shown me. And these are really difficult issues that don't have simple answers, but that doesn't mean we give up.
We have to keep thinking and learning and trying and finding Solutions in everything. We do, including on these, these big Global tragedies that we live through, and it's heartbreaking. What's going on. It just breaks my heart every day, a person who studies this has been studying this for decades and it keeps happening. And you think again and yes, it is again, but we still
We'll have to keep trying and we have to be inspired by those people who are more courageous than we are and sacrifice more than we sacrifice, you know, for me, the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The war in Ukraine is experienced in my study at home. And in my office at Princeton, or my coming office at Stanford. When I move full-time to Stanford in September or, or it's experienced far away in safety and income.
For and we have to remember that to when we talk about these things when we answer your questions, write that as we speak. And as we comment and think we're experts on these things from the comfort of our existence that there are people in those tragedies right now,
with no power, with no food with no with full uncertainty about the future of the health of their children. That's it. And and I've also seen
Because I have family both places homes that were home for buildings that were homes for Generations. Now in rubble.
So
yes, Lex it just it hurts. And it's let's it's Syria where 350,000 at least by un estimates died and Russia participated in that and it's Yemen and, and it's so many other places that don't have the same degree of attention that our European country, like Ukraine has, but but yeah, we have to remember also that in,
Addition to Ukraine, and then there's things right home here in New York City where children are without food, which is just inexcusable in a country this Rich.
So we shouldn't forget in our study of leaders and our study of geopolitics that ultimately, it's about the humanity. It's a state human beings and okay, like human suffering. Thank you so much. Thank you. This is amazing conversation. Talk to you again soon. My pleasure.
Thanks for listening to this conversation with Stephen kotkin to support this podcast. Please. Check out our sponsors in the description. And now let me leave you with some words from Mahatma Gandhi. When I despair. I remember that all through history, the way of Truth and Love have always won.
There have been tyrants and murderers. And for time, they can seem Invincible. But in the end, they always fall.
Thank you for listening. I hope to see you next time.
